It is fair to say the Mexican peso (MXN) is somewhat unloved at present. Chart 1 shows the speculative positioning at the Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME) for the week ending January 27th. As can be seen in the chart, the currency is currently ‘enjoying’ some of the biggest net speculative short positioning it has ever known.

The currency fell almost 12% in the immediate aftermath of Trump’s victory and, from that point, proceeded to decline another 5% to an all-time nadir of just under USD22 on January 19th, before seeing a mild recovery. From our perspective, it is possible that this fall indicates the sale of positions held by other types of market participants, in addition to speculators. We suspect that these liquidations, coupled with continued pressure from speculators in a market with very thin liquidity, are what produced the downward move in MXN valuation.

Chart 1. MXN speculative positioning (ag USD) at the CME

We do not consider ourselves contrarian investors by identity, but in this instance we cannot justify going with the grain. Given the extent that flows have reached, we believe it is likely that positioning is now very clean. Moreover, with the trade balance – and consequently the current account – starting to improve and the Central Bank finally intervening, it has become much more difficult for the MXN to weaken any further in our view.

Some are understandably concerned about the rising animosity between Presidents Trump and Nieto. Although it was not a good sign that the latter cancelled his planned visit to the US, the fact that the two presidents held a relatively constructive call after the cancelation did something to help alleviate the situation. We therefore believe that the pattern of events so far cannot justify the belief that high tariffs (i.e. much more than 10%) will be imposed on Mexico in the near term.

There is also a more structural reason why the MXN could continue its recovery. Chart 2 shows the evolution of the different components of Mexico’s balance of payments (BOP), as well as the country’s accumulation of reserves. Between Q1 2011 and Q2 2014, portfolio flows moved noticeably higher, while the rest of the BOP’s components did not experience drastic changes in aggregate (the increase in FDI being neutralized by a decrease in the current account balance).

Over this same period, it can be observed that foreign reserves increased steadily (from roughly USD95bn to USD195bn). This implied to us that, when portfolio capital was flowing into Mexico, the Central Bank responded by buying the USD to prevent the currency from appreciating.

Chart 3 provides further evidence for this theory. It can be observed that, over the same period as Chart 2, USMXN traded at an average of 12.92. In late 2014, the currency pair experienced a breakout, with the cross moving up meaningfully as portfolio inflows were collapsing.

We believe that the main reason for this move – which continued up to 18.36 by the end of Q2 2016 –was driven by the fact that, despite the portfolio inflows collapsing, the Central Bank did not meaningfully sell down the USD reserves that it had previously built up. We can see this in Chart 2 where, although portfolio inflows experienced a quarterly decrease from USD 17.2bn in Q2 2014 to USD4.1bn in Q2 2016, reserves barely fell. This means that, today, the Central Bank retains significant fire power to potentially halt the MXN’s decline.

Chart 2. Mexico Reserves and Balance of Payments components

Chart 3. USDMXN and 4-yr moving average

In summary, when we look at Mexico today, we see a current account which has recently bottomed (Q2 2016), portfolio flows at levels we last saw in 2010 and a Central Bank which is beginning to intervene in the FX market by selling some of its USD reserves. In our view, it is difficult to see how this combination leads to further MXN depreciation, and instead indicates that it may cause appreciation.

Download full article

Further GLG Views

We present evidence arguing for the existence of alpha in EM, and showing the importance of using micro and macro perspectives.

Edward Cole, Simon Pickard

Simon and Ed discuss the benefits of incorporating ESG factors in EM investing.

Simon Pickard, Edward Cole

Important information

Opinions expressed are those of the author and may not be shared by all personnel of Man Group plc (‘Man’). These opinions are subject to change without notice, are for information purposes only and do not constitute an offer or invitation to make an investment in any financial instrument or in any product to which the Company and/or its affiliates provides investment advisory or any other financial services. Any organisations, financial instrument or products described in this material are mentioned for reference purposes only which should not be considered a recommendation for their purchase or sale. Neither the Company nor the authors shall be liable to any person for any action taken on the basis of the information provided. Some statements contained in this material concerning goals, strategies, outlook or other non-historical matters may be forward-looking statements and are based on current indicators and expectations. These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date on which they are made, and the Company undertakes no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in the statements. The Company and/or its affiliates may or may not have a position in any financial instrument mentioned and may or may not be actively trading in any such securities. This material is proprietary information of the Company and its affiliates and may not be reproduced or otherwise disseminated in whole or in part without prior written consent from the Company. The Company believes the content to be accurate. However accuracy is not warranted or guaranteed. The Company does not assume any liability in the case of incorrectly reported or incomplete information. Unless stated otherwise all information is provided by the Company. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

US/GL/I/W

Please update your browser

Unfortunately we no longer support Internet Explorer 8, 7 and older for security reasons.

Please update your browser to a later version and try to access our site again.

Many thanks.