A farewell to arms – the inexorable decline of China's external surplus

At the end of June, China’s State Administration of Foreign Exchange ('SAFE') released revised Q1 current account data, showing USD34 billion quarterly deficit, the weakest data since 1998 when the series began. In this piece, the Portfolio Managers outline reasons for why they believe the Chinese current account deficit is here to stay. There is a structural trend in trade and tourism that seems to erode the current account surplus entirely, even before considering the implications of international trade disputes. Markets may need to become accustomed to the current account deficit, with accompanying implications for FX volatility.

17 JULY 2018


At the end of June, China’s State Administration of Foreign Exchange ('SAFE') released revised first-quarter current-account data, showing USD34 billion in quarterly deficit, the weakest data since 1998 when the series began. On a 4-quarter ('4Q') rolling basis, the current account is still running a surplus, to the tune of USD115 billion, c1% of GDP. And the overall balance of payments is in reasonable shape, supported by a record high capital account surplus (USD73 billion in Q1, and USD90 billion on a 4Q rolling basis). From the perspective of financial stability, capital account inflows are unequivocally good news in contrast to the dark days of 2014 and 2015 when capital flight was elevated. However, there is a structural trend in trade and tourism that seems likely to erode current account surplus entirely, even before we begin to consider any further deterioration related to international trade disputes. Markets will need to become accustomed to current account in deficit, with accompanying implications for FX volatility. Below, we set out a few charts explaining the underlying trends.


China’s headline trade surplus is running at a reasonably healthy USD400 billion on a 12-month basis (Figure 1). Relative to GDP, however, it is close to its lowest level in over 10 years, and has declined by cUSD200 billion (2.5% versus GDP, Figure 2) in the last two years.

Figure 1. China Trade Balance

Source: Bloomberg, 30 June 2018.

The main driver of this deterioration is energy. Looking at the value of primary energy net imports (crude, LNG and natural gas) China runs a deficit, of cUSD220 billion on a 12-month basis. Comparing the primary energy balance chart (Figure 3), with the overall trade (Figures 1 and 2), it is clear that the large improvement in the trade balance began in 2014 when the oil price collapsed. However, it is notable that in April 2010, when crude was at broadly the same price it is today (WTI at USD75/barrel) the energy deficit was roughly half the current level in USD terms.

Figure 2. China Trade Balance as a Percentage of GDP

Source: Bloomberg, 29 June 2018.

Figure 3. China Primary Energy Balance

Source: Bloomberg, 31 May 2018.

Two things have happened, that are unlikely to go away: first, crude volumes have grown 9% compound since 2010, broadly in line with the compound growth rate of passenger vehicles over the same period; second, China’s efforts to clean up its air quality has seen coal consumption peak in 2013, with a growing consumption of imported gas to offset: the natural gas and LNG deficit has more than doubled, to USD4.8 billion, since the beginning of 2016.

Figure 4. China 12-Month Auto Sales

Source: Bloomberg, 31 May 2018.


Chinese outbound tourism numbers are running at c150 million annually, and have grown over 10% annually since data began in 2013. Ten years ago, the contribution of tourism to the current account was virtually zero, whereas there is now a deficit of almost USD230 billion, c2% of GDP. The number of Chinese with passports is estimated to be c120m (Source: Ctrip), fewer than 10% of the population, and on some projections could double by the early 2020s. It is our expectation that the tourism deficit is set to grow structurally. Indeed, we have an investment in an airport operator, which has been enjoying the tailwind of growing air passenger numbers and duty-free spend.

Figure 5. China Tourism Balance

Source: Bloomberg, 31 March 2018.

Trade + Tourism = Deficit

Putting these two components of the current account together, they sum to over USD450 billion of annual deficit, 3.5% of GDP. The energy deficit will fluctuate with oil prices, but looks likely to rise structurally with volumes and a changing domestic energy mix. In terms of tourism, perhaps Beijing will pull some levers to promote domestic tourism (gaming in Hainan), and over time, and with improving air quality, inbound tourist numbers will grow. In the near-term, however, the tourism deficit looks likely to grow.

This entire discussion has avoided exports, of which there have been USD450 billion alone to the US in the last 12 months, the subject of intense scrutiny by the US administration. We have no particular insight into this side of China’s trade balance, but we’re acutely aware that Trump’s calculus is that China has more to lose from a trade war, and that in the bigger picture the US economy is at a reasonably late stage in its cycle. The structural surplus that emerging markets have assumed for China might soon be a thing of the past.

Download full article

Latest GLG Views

Just like in the late 1990s (following the US tightening of 1994), we believe EMD will get stressed over the coming years.

Guillermo Ossés

Do criticisms of buybacks – manipulate stock prices higher, crowd out investment, de-equitise public capital markets – have merit?

Edward Cole

Important information

Opinions expressed are those of the author and may not be shared by all personnel of Man Group plc (‘Man’). These opinions are subject to change without notice, are for information purposes only and do not constitute an offer or invitation to make an investment in any financial instrument or in any product to which the Company and/or its affiliates provides investment advisory or any other financial services. Any organisations, financial instrument or products described in this material are mentioned for reference purposes only which should not be considered a recommendation for their purchase or sale. Neither the Company nor the authors shall be liable to any person for any action taken on the basis of the information provided. Some statements contained in this material concerning goals, strategies, outlook or other non-historical matters may be forward-looking statements and are based on current indicators and expectations. These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date on which they are made, and the Company undertakes no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in the statements. The Company and/or its affiliates may or may not have a position in any financial instrument mentioned and may or may not be actively trading in any such securities. This material is proprietary information of the Company and its affiliates and may not be reproduced or otherwise disseminated in whole or in part without prior written consent from the Company. The Company believes the content to be accurate. However accuracy is not warranted or guaranteed. The Company does not assume any liability in the case of incorrectly reported or incomplete information. Unless stated otherwise all information is provided by the Company. Past performance is not indicative of future results.


Please update your browser

Unfortunately we no longer support Internet Explorer 8, 7 and older for security reasons.

Please update your browser to a later version and try to access our site again.

Many thanks.